Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.

IMPORTANCE: Occupational therapists need dependable and accurate instruments for remote assessments and monitoring of hand functionality. These assessments monitor progress, evaluate interventions, and guide independence goals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interinstrument reliability and concurrent validity of the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. DESIGN: Repeated-measures design. SETTING: Individual clinic in Bucharest, Romania. PARTICIPANTS: Forty middle-age and older adult volunteers, healthy and free from any neuromuscular, orthopedic dysfunction that affected hand strength. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Participants' maximal grip strength (MGS) for both their dominant and nondominant hands was measured with both devices. Participants with odd-numbered IDs were measured with the Squegg first and the Jamar second, and those with even-numbered IDs were measured in opposite sequence. RESULTS: Paired-samples t tests on overall mean MGS and mean MGS (three measures on each hand) showed no statistically significant differences between the two devices. Intraclass correlation analysis showed good to excellent interinstrument agreement. Pearson correlations between measurements across all participants, and hands, indicated strong agreement. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Squegg shows promise for health care professionals, including occupational therapists, for grip strength assessment in clinical contexts. What This Article Adds: These results offer initial psychometric data for a new remote MGS measurement device. MGS is crucial for assessing the physical function of aging adults. Reliable measurements from such a device are vital for occupational therapists to guide treatment interventions and assess hand function's impact on daily activities.

The effect of selective retrieval practice on forgetting rates in younger and older adults.

Recent findings demonstrate that selective retrieval practice (SRP), specifically the retrieval of subparts of material, not just retrieval of the entire encoded material, can enhance later memory performance. We present two experiments that investigated whether SRP enhances memory performance among older adults. We also examined to what extent this effect is enhanced by the level of integration of the studied material. We used a design that contrasts the performance of the groups in conditions with and without SRP. This design also allowed us to examine whether older adults present with faster forgetting compared to younger individuals when assessed over a long delay. In both experiments, participants were exposed to a learning phase in which they had to achieve a criterion of 70% correct recall and were then tested at 1 month. The SRP for the experimental group occurred 1 day and 1 week after the learning phase (the control group received no SRP). None of the items at 1-month delay was probed in the retrieval practice. Experiment 1 used integrated material (four short stories). Experiment 2 used less integrated material (16 sentences). Both age groups showed a decline in memory performance over 1 month, however, groups tested repeatedly showed better performance (irrespective of age or material). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Forgetting in Alzheimer's disease: Is it fast? Is it affected by repeated retrieval?

OBJECTIVES: Whether people with Alzheimer's Disease present with accelerated long term forgetting compared to healthy controls is still debated. Typically, accelerated long term forgetting implies testing the same participants repeatedly over several delays. This testing method raises the issue of confounding repetition effects with forgetting rates. We used a novel procedure to disentangle the two effects. METHODS: Four short stories were presented during an initial in-person assessment of 40 patients with Alzheimer's Disease and 42 age-matched healthy controls. Our aim was for participants to reach a score of 70% correct (9 out of 13 questions) at encoding. If this criterion was not achieved after the first trial, the four stories were presented again (in a different order); participants took the 1 min filler task again and were then retested. We repeated this process until participants reached the 70% criterion or to a maximum of four trials. Cued recall memory tests were completed during follow-up telephone call(s) at different delay intervals. Study material was presented only at encoding, then probed with different question sets on all other delays. Each question set tested different sub-parts of the material. The experiment employed a mixed design. Participants were randomly allocated to either a condition without retrieval practice or a condition with retrieval practice. Participants in the condition without retrieval practice were only tested at two delays: post encoding filled delay and at one month. Participants in the condition with retrieval practice were tested at four delays: post encoding filled delay, one day, one week and one month. Our methodological design allowed us to separate the effects of retesting from the effects of delay. RESULTS: Alzheimer's Disease patients showed a significant encoding deficit reflected in the higher number of trials required to reach criterion. Using Linear Mixed Models, we found no group by delay interactions between the post encoding filled delay retrieval and one month delays, with Alzheimer's Disease groups having a similar decline in performance to healthy controls, irrespective of testing condition. Significant condition by delay interactions were found for both groups (Alzheimer's Disease and healthy controls), with better performance at one month in the condition with retrieval practice. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that Alzheimer's Disease is not characterised by accelerated long term forgetting, patients in our sample forgot at the same rate as healthy controls. Given the additional trials required by Alzheimer's patients to reach the 70% correct criterion, their memory impairment appears to be one of encoding. Moreover, Alzheimer's Disease patients benefited from repeated testing to the same extent as healthy controls. Due to our methodological design, we were also able to show that performance improved under repeated testing conditions, even with partial testing (sampling different features from each narrative on every test session/delay) in both healthy controls and Alzheimer's Disease.

A transcultural cognitive marker of Alzheimer's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Temporary binding (TB) is sensitive and specific to Alzheimer's Disease (AD), is not affected by age, repeated testing or level of education. Hence, TB is useful to assess patients with very different socio-cultural backgrounds. However, the current computerised version of the test is not suitable for use in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a clinically friendly version of the TB task results in overlapping outcomes compared to the computerised version. METHODS: A newly devised Flash-card version of the TB assesses temporary visual binding for arrays of stimuli such as shapes (polygons), colours, or combinations of shapes and colours. In Experiment 1, this version was compared with the laboratory computerised version. In Experiment 2, 33 AD patients and 33 matched controls, recruited from various geriatric centres in Romania, were assessed with the new TB test and with Free and Cued Selective Reminding test. RESULTS: The results with the Flash-card version of the TB test were comparable to those obtained with the computerised version. TB was not affected by age, but it was impaired by AD. The sensitivity and specificity of the new TB test were found to be greater than those achieved by a Selective Reminding test. CONCLUSIONS: TB deficits may be conceived as a fundamental marker of AD. The Flash-card version is suitable for clinical use also in primary care facilities and in intervention trials, requires minimal training for administration and scoring, is quick to administer, non-invasive, inexpensive, and facilitates cross-cultural studies. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.